When creating a microflow with a Change Object activity dependent on multiple checks, what is the best design approach?

The best design approach in this scenario is to use Decisions in a sub-microflow and return the value. This method promotes better organization and modularity in the overall microflow design.

By placing checks in a sub-microflow, you can encapsulate the logic related to those checks in a separate, reusable component. This not only makes the main microflow cleaner and easier to read but also allows for the sub-microflow to be used in other parts of the application if needed. It enhances maintainability, as any updates to the checks can be made in one place without affecting the main flow's structure.

Additionally, implementing checks as Decisions inside a sub-microflow allows for a clear and logical flow where the results of these checks can be easily returned and interpreted. This approach helps to eliminate potential confusion in the main flow, which can become complex if too many checks are included directly.

This design helps in tracking the flow of data and decisions more effectively, ensuring that the logic remains scalable and straightforward as the application evolves.