Which method can be used to implement error handling in microflows?

Utilizing the 'error handling' flow option is an effective method for implementing error handling in microflows because it allows developers to define specific actions that should occur when an error is encountered during the execution of a microflow. This feature facilitates the management of exceptions in a structured way, enabling developers to build robust applications that can handle unexpected situations gracefully.

By incorporating this flow option, a microflow can redirect the process to a different path where error logging, user notifications, or alternative workflows can be executed. This is crucial to ensure that the application remains stable and that users are informed of issues without crashing the entire flow.

This approach is preferred over creating new microflows for each error, which can lead to increased complexity and maintenance challenges. Meanwhile, disabling error notifications can cause users to miss important alerts about issues. Lastly, running a debug session is a tool for troubleshooting during development rather than a mechanism for handling errors in a live environment. Such a tool is useful for understanding errors but doesn't provide a solution for managing errors during regular microflow execution.